Grafana Tempo vs SigNoz

Which wins: Grafana Tempo vs SigNoz? Dive into our expert analysis of features and costs to decide for your engineering team. Review user feedback.​..

Quick Verdict

Grafana Tempo excels at core workflow integration; SigNoz wins on log aggregation and full-stack apm. Choose Grafana Tempo if you prioritize core workflow integration; choose SigNoz if you need log aggregation and full-stack apm.

Grafana Tempo vs SigNoz Feature Comparison

Grafana Tempo vs SigNoz Feature Comparison
Feature Grafana Tempo SigNoz
Log Aggregation Not supported No Tracing backend, not log aggregation Supported Yes Log management with ClickHouse backend
Full-Stack APM Not supported No Tracing only, not full APM Supported Yes Logs, metrics, traces, and exceptions in one platform
Dashboards Supported Yes Native Grafana integration for trace visualization Supported Yes Built-in dashboards for traces, metrics, logs
Alerting Supported Yes Trace-based alerting rules Supported Yes Alerting with Slack, PagerDuty, and webhook integrations
Metrics Not supported No Object-storage only — no indexing overhead Supported Yes Full-text and structured log search
Query Language Supported Yes TraceQL query language Supported Yes ClickHouse SQL queries for logs and traces
Horizontal Scaling Supported Yes Horizontal scaling via object storage Supported Yes ClickHouse clustering for horizontal scaling
Multi-Tenancy Supported Yes Multi-tenant trace storage Supported Yes Multi-tenancy with organization-level isolation
Integrations Supported Yes Grafana, Loki, Mimir integrations Supported Yes OpenTelemetry native, Jaeger, Zipkin support
Storage Backends Supported Yes S3, GCS, Azure Blob, local storage Supported Yes ClickHouse, S3-tiered storage

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you click any of these links and make a purchase, at no additional cost to you. This does not influence our reviews.

About Grafana Tempo

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you click any of these links and make a purchase, at no additional cost to you. This does not influence our reviews.

Grafana Tempo is a distributed tracing backend that stores traces object storage only (no indexing), making it extremely cost-effective at scale. Supports OpenTracing, OpenTelemetry, and Jaeger formats. Integrates with Grafana for trace visualization and Loki for log-trace correlation. TraceQL provides a powerful query language similar to LogQL.

Explore Grafana Tempo

About SigNoz

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you click any of these links and make a purchase, at no additional cost to you. This does not influence our reviews.

SigNoz is an open-source observability platform that provides logs, metrics, and traces in a single application. Built on ClickHouse for high-performance querying, it offers distributed tracing, log management, metrics, dashboards, and alerting without requiring multiple tools. Aims to be an open-source alternative to Datadog without per-host pricing.

Explore SigNoz

Related Links

Platform Profiles

Grafana Tempo Alternatives

SigNoz Alternatives

Best For

Home

We value your privacy

We use cookies to keep our independent reviews free. Accepting affiliate tracking attributes outbound clicks to vendor partners at no cost to you — it never affects our rankings or your price. Read our Privacy Policy for details.

Required for basic site functionality and security. Cannot be disabled.

Google Analytics: helps us understand how visitors interact with our site.

Affiliate partner cookies: attribute referral clicks to partner platforms (no personal data).

Marketing personalization (Google Ads, etc.) - not currently used but reserved for future.

Cookie Policy